Where is the business technology landscape heading for 2025 and beyond?

Rich Byard
Chief Technology Officer
Was it only a quarter of a century ago we were all consumed with the millenium bug and the possibility of the end of technology as we knew it? Apparently so, but thankfully, that didn’t happen and there’s a lesson there for us all; don’t catastrophize when it comes to technology, we’ll be ok.
However, we are again at an inflexion point. Facing a business technology landscape poised for, and in need of, significant change. The nascent AI offerings are starting to mature and will become critical to an organization’s success. AI is, of course, just one part of the technology revolution as systems require structure and predictability, as such data management and governance will continue to play a crucial role both in helping present the framework for the topical application of AI as well as that data becoming the fuel for this new technology to really embed itself in your organization.
AI: Evolving from mundane bots or wildly creative image or text generators to purposeful business-critical process enablers
In 2024, AI got everyone hyped and excelled at streamlining creativity, tasks that didn’t need the bounds of reality or nuanced context for accuracy. We coined the term ‘prompt engineer’, which quickly became the new ‘data scientist’, as the go to university grads dream job. It’s an exciting time playing with these new toys, but questions remain, and can we make the leap to really handling nuanced, business-critical processes in 2025?
Perhaps the best answer to where we are heading is in adoption rates. Gartner (2024) identified that 44% of CEOs had used a popular AI service to help in their work, the only time they have seen adoption anywhere close to this was the iPad, when 40% of CEOs had started using it in the first 6 months after release [1]. An interesting comparison of the appetite that is being driven from the top down.
AI-powered automation is set to transform various business processes, from finance and human resources to supply chain and customer service. In 2025, we’ll see AI handling tasks that require judgment and decision-making, moving beyond simple rule-based automation. However, the transition won’t be without challenges. Organizations will need to carefully integrate AI into their existing workflows and processes, ensuring that it complements rather than disrupts.
Corporate Readiness for Change
While the potential for AI-driven transformation is immense, there is an elephant in the room. Many, if not most, large corporations are still running legacy ERP systems, even if transformed into the cloud, the premise is still based on outdated 1980s technology approaches. This has posed, and continues to pose, significant barriers to change. We’re all familiar with IT project lifecycles in years, not weeks, and building AI into such cumbersome infrastructure is not going to be magically solve this. An IBM article identified that 77% of execs say they need to adopt GenAI quickly to compete, but only 25% agree their organization has the IT infrastructure to support it [2].
Organizations must think bigger when it comes to digital transformation. Updating core systems should not mean moving to the cloud version of the same stale product, but basing their future in technology built with the agility to ensure change can continue to be made and integrating seamlessly with new technologies that are trailed and productionized quickly. This requires a significant change in mindset for organizations and staff, and significant investment in both technology and change management.
Successful companies in 2025 will be those that embrace this flexibility and engage proactively with modern platforms and AI technologies. They will need to foster a culture of continuous improvement and innovation, breaking down silos between departments to facilitate seamless integration of new technologies. ‘Change manager’ should really be the university grads dream job, the new ‘prompt engineer’, as they are often the missing glue that’s needed to make a modern, innovative, agile organization tick!
The evolution of organizational data assets (data lakes) in this AI world
The concept of data lakes has evolved significantly. Once touted as a solution for storing vast amounts of unstructured data, data lakes are now rarely spoken of. The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has shifted the focus from in-house organizational data to already modelled public, generic data. Imagine relying on the average response on the internet for your decision-making, a scary prospect.
The real breakthrough will come for those organizations who can combine the power of generic LLMs with context-rich organizational data, putting those data lakes to work! This fusion could lead to AI systems that truly understand the nuances of a specific organization and its place in the world, making AI significantly more useful for business-critical process challenges.
How to prepare your organization for this exciting future
I love a revolution, but we are in need of a good shake-up at a minimum. Organizational structures need to evolve significantly as we’re still very much stuck in the old way of doing things. To prepare for this future, here are a few takeouts:
- Skills Development: Organizations must invest heavily in upskilling and reskilling their workforce. Technical skills for those who need it are important of course, but the soft skills that will enable workers to thrive are key. Adaptability and critical thinking are the key to an empowered and enabled workforce.
- Adaptive Organizational Structures: Companies need to create more flexible, project-based structures that can quickly adapt to technological changes. We need to stop thinking about the old school department structure, and start to bring in the short-lifespan pods with the right mix of people and skills for the specific project at hand.
- Collaborative Ecosystems: Businesses should be looking to foster partnerships with tech companies, startups, and academic institutions to stay at the forefront of technological advancements. This brings many benefits such as new revenue streams and empowered workers getting new skills, but more importantly ensures your organization gets a seat at the table to get a platform that truly works for you. A little time and knowledge from your team is a small price to pay for the innovative market-leading systems you’ll be getting hold of first!
Conclusion:
So, let’s lose the blinkers of the past, let’s imagine how the organization should work without the shackles of our legacy approaches (whilst still keeping good governance of course). Let’s embrace the opportunity to be on top as this era-defining transition unfolds. And be bold in your choices, as if you’re not the competition, that may not even exist yet, will be!
Find out more About Cyferd
New York
Americas Tower
1177 6th Avenue
5th Floor
New York
NY 10036
London
2nd Floor,
Berkeley Square House,
Berkeley Square,
London W1J 6BD
Request a Demo
Comparisons
BOAT Platform Comparison 2026
Timelines and pricing vary significantly based on scope, governance, and integration complexity.
What Is a BOAT Platform?
Business Orchestration and Automation Technology (BOAT) platforms coordinate end-to-end workflows across teams, systems, and decisions.
Unlike RPA, BPM, or point automation tools, BOAT platforms:
- Orchestrate cross-functional processes
- Integrate operational systems and data
- Embed AI-driven decision-making directly into workflows
BOAT platforms focus on how work flows across the enterprise, not just how individual tasks are automated.
Why Many Automation Initiatives Fail
Most automation programs fail due to architectural fragmentation, not poor tools.
Common challenges include:
- Siloed workflows optimised locally, not end-to-end
- Data spread across disconnected platforms
- AI added after processes are already fixed
- High coordination overhead between tools
BOAT platforms address this by aligning orchestration, automation, data, and AI within a single operational model, improving ROI and adaptability.
Enterprise BOAT Platform Comparison
Appian
Strengths
Well established in regulated industries, strong compliance, governance, and BPMN/DMN modeling. Mature partner ecosystem and support for low-code and professional development.
Considerations
9–18 month implementations, often supported by professional services. Adapting processes post-deployment can be slower in dynamic environments.
Best for
BPM-led organizations with formal governance and regulatory requirements.
Questions to ask Appian:
- How can we accelerate time to production while maintaining governance and compliance?
- What is the balance between professional services and internal capability building?
- How flexible is the platform when processes evolve unexpectedly?
Cyferd
Strengths
Built on a single, unified architecture combining workflow, automation, data, and AI. Reduces coordination overhead and enables true end-to-end orchestration. Embedded AI and automation support incremental modernization without locking decisions early. Transparent pricing and faster deployment cycles.
Considerations
Smaller ecosystem than legacy platforms; integration catalog continues to grow. Benefits from clear business ownership and process clarity.
Best for
Organizations reducing tool sprawl, modernizing incrementally, and maintaining flexibility as systems and processes evolve.
Questions to ask Cyferd:
- How does your integration catalog align with our existing systems and workflows?
- What is the typical timeline from engagement to production for an organization of our size and complexity?
- How do you support scaling adoption across multiple business units or geographies?
IBM Automation Suite
Strengths
Extensive automation and AI capabilities, strong hybrid and mainframe support, enterprise-grade security, deep architectural expertise.
Considerations
Multiple product components increase coordination effort. Planning phases can extend time to value; total cost includes licenses and services.
Best for
Global enterprises with complex hybrid infrastructure and deep IBM investments.
Questions to ask IBM:
- How do the Cloud Pak components work together for end-to-end orchestration?
- What is the recommended approach for phasing implementation to accelerate time to value?
- What internal skills or external support are needed to scale the platform?
Microsoft Power Platform
Strengths
Integrates deeply with Microsoft 365, Teams, Dynamics, and Azure. Supports citizen and professional developers, large connector ecosystem.
Considerations
Capabilities spread across tools, requiring strong governance. Consumption-based pricing can be hard to forecast; visibility consolidation may require additional tools.
Best for
Microsoft-centric organizations seeking self-service automation aligned with Azure.
Questions to ask Microsoft:
- How should Power Platform deployments be governed across multiple business units?
- What is the typical cost trajectory as usage scales enterprise-wide?
- How do you handle integration with legacy or third-party systems?
Pega
Strengths
Advanced decisioning, case management, multi-channel orchestration. Strong adoption in financial services and healthcare; AI frameworks for next-best-action.
Considerations
Requires certified practitioners, long-term investment, premium pricing, and ongoing specialist involvement.
Best for
Organizations where decisioning and complex case orchestration are strategic differentiators.
Questions to ask Pega:
- How do you balance decisioning depth with deployment speed?
- What internal capabilities are needed to maintain and scale the platform?
- How does licensing scale as adoption grows across business units?
ServiceNow
Strengths
Mature ITSM and ITOM foundation, strong audit and compliance capabilities. Expanding into HR, operations, and customer workflows.
Considerations
Configuration-first approach can limit rapid experimentation; licensing scales with usage; upgrades require structured testing. Often seen as IT-centric.
Best for
Enterprises prioritizing standardization, governance, and IT service management integration.
Questions to ask ServiceNow:
- How do you support rapid prototyping for business-led initiatives?
- What is the typical timeline from concept to production for cross-functional workflows?
- How do licensing costs evolve as platform adoption scales globally?
