Shadow AI Exposed: Protect Your Data Before It’s Gone

Rich Byard
Chief Technology Officer
That Moment When… That “Helpful” AI Bot Opens a Wormhole to Your Company’s Biggest Blind Spot.
I live and love technology, but I lose plenty of sleep pondering the multitude of ways in which this weird world is going to bite me in the ass. Yep, I get to worry about the digital bogeymen so you don’t have to, whatever colour hat they wear. But over the last year or more, there’s one risk that is simply proving hard to tame and wears no hat: “Shadow AI.“
Sounds a bit dramatic, sort of. It’s not rocket science: when your staff use public AI tools – you know the ones – for their work they risk escaping the ever-evolving governance safety net the organisation (org) has in place. They’re just trying to get the job done faster (and often better), kudos for that. But are the risks really understood by all? And are we setting ourselves up for a massive own goal for the business? We have policies and processes in place, of course, and educate our teams zealously – as anyone who spends time with me on calls will attest – but is our only option to block those sites so we feel the risk is managed, and would that even work with access on any device? Users are creative for sure.
But in all seriousness, we’re talking about the org’s precious and possibly sensitive data being shared without due process, and when that goes wrong the risk of copping huge fines and a huge impact on your org’s reputation. So, let’s discuss the real risks and how to sort it out before it all goes pear-shaped.
1. Your Data’s Gone.. but where?
Every time someone quickly pastes a bit, even a morsel, of internal info into a public chatbot, you’ve basically lost control of it forever. Think about it: draft company strategies, customer details, secret product designs… once it’s in their system, it’s out of your hands. A lot of these free AI platforms use your data to train their models (and I question whether those are simply the ones that are honest about it, there are certainly questions around the ethical sourcing of much of the data used to train these LLMs). That means your confidential info could pop up in an answer for someone else. Maybe even your biggest competitor.
Such a small oversight, a moment of inattention, by the individual. But a moment of significant risk for the Org as a whole.
Picture this: One of your staff, under pressure to deliver to a deadline, uploads a spreadsheet full of customer info and sales targets to an AI to whip up a few slides. Job done. But now, all that juicy data is part of the AI’s brain. You’ve just sprung a data leak without a single hacker in sight.
2. Who Owns This Stuff Anyway? (And a Warning About Lawyers)
The rules around who actually owns AI-generated content are murky to say the least, as the number of copyright lawsuits against each of the AI companies highlights. When your team uses these random tools, you’re stepping into a legal quagmire. Does the company own the work? Does the AI provider? No one really knows for sure.
What we do know is that the content it spits out could accidentally rip off someone else’s copyrighted material. If you then use that AI-made slogan or bit of code in your business, you’re leaving yourself wide open. You can bet there will be a pack of ‘ambulance chasers’ (lawyers) just clamouring to hit you with an IP infringement case. It’s an easy payday for them and a massive, expensive headache for you.
3. Ticking Off the Regulators (A Really Bad Idea)
Your business has rules to follow. Whether it’s GDPR, HIPAA, or local financial regulations, you’ve got processes to keep everything above board. Shadow AI throws a massive spanner in those works.
It bypasses all your carefully planned checks and balances. There’s no audit trail, no way to prove you’re handling data properly. For any business in finance, healthcare, or government work, this isn’t just risky, it’s downright dangerous. Getting caught out means eye-watering fines and the kind of bad press that sticks around for years.
4. Upsetting Your Clients and Breaching Contracts
You’ve got contracts with your clients that promise you’ll keep their information confidential. That trust is the bedrock of your business. Using Shadow AI could smash that trust to pieces.
Imagine your team summarises a sensitive client report using a free online tool. You’ve just broken your promise and probably your contract. If the client finds out – and they often do during audits – you’re looking at a nasty dispute, or they might just walk away. It’s simply not worth the risk.
5. The Game Plan: How to Get a Handle on AI
Look, this isn’t about banning AI. That ship has sailed. It’s about using it smartly and safely. You need to channel all that enthusiasm from your team into something that helps the business instead of hurting it.
Here’s the game plan, no mucking about:
- Set Some Clear, Common-Sense Rules: Put together a simple AI policy. What’s okay to use? What’s off-limits? Make it easy for everyone to understand.
- Keep the Discussion Current, and Keep it Going: Don’t just send out a memo. Explain why you’re doing this. When people get the risks, they’re much more likely to be on board.
- Give Them a Safe Sandpit to Play In: This is the big one. If you give your team a secure, company-approved AI platform to use with governance built in – One like Cyferd that’s built for business – they won’t need to go elsewhere for many uses of AI (let’s be honest we all use many different tools for different outputs and no one is master of all).
- Keep an Eye on Things: Use your existing governance tools to monitor and manage unapproved apps and network traffic. A quick check, and a quick chat with a user, now and then can save you a world of pain later. And do we need a whole new department for this? AI Compliance Office, AI Conscience Office, AI Protection Office, Guardians against the Tyranny of the Bots Office etc., suggestions welcome!
So: Sort It Now, or Regret It Later
Let’s be blunt: Shadow AI is not some small IT issue. It’s a proper business risk that should be on the board’s radar.
The companies that get this right won’t just be protecting themselves; they’ll be turning smart, secure AI use into a real competitive edge. Have a proper look at where you might be exposed and get some controls in place. It’s far better to be proactive now than to be cleaning up a massive mess down the track.
Find out more About Cyferd
New York
Americas Tower
1177 6th Avenue
5th Floor
New York
NY 10036
London
2nd Floor,
Berkeley Square House,
Berkeley Square,
London W1J 6BD
Request a Demo
Comparisons
BOAT Platform Comparison 2026
Timelines and pricing vary significantly based on scope, governance, and integration complexity.
What Is a BOAT Platform?
Business Orchestration and Automation Technology (BOAT) platforms coordinate end-to-end workflows across teams, systems, and decisions.
Unlike RPA, BPM, or point automation tools, BOAT platforms:
- Orchestrate cross-functional processes
- Integrate operational systems and data
- Embed AI-driven decision-making directly into workflows
BOAT platforms focus on how work flows across the enterprise, not just how individual tasks are automated.
Why Many Automation Initiatives Fail
Most automation programs fail due to architectural fragmentation, not poor tools.
Common challenges include:
- Siloed workflows optimised locally, not end-to-end
- Data spread across disconnected platforms
- AI added after processes are already fixed
- High coordination overhead between tools
BOAT platforms address this by aligning orchestration, automation, data, and AI within a single operational model, improving ROI and adaptability.
Enterprise BOAT Platform Comparison
Appian
Strengths
Well established in regulated industries, strong compliance, governance, and BPMN/DMN modeling. Mature partner ecosystem and support for low-code and professional development.
Considerations
9–18 month implementations, often supported by professional services. Adapting processes post-deployment can be slower in dynamic environments.
Best for
BPM-led organizations with formal governance and regulatory requirements.
Questions to ask Appian:
- How can we accelerate time to production while maintaining governance and compliance?
- What is the balance between professional services and internal capability building?
- How flexible is the platform when processes evolve unexpectedly?
Cyferd
Strengths
Built on a single, unified architecture combining workflow, automation, data, and AI. Reduces coordination overhead and enables true end-to-end orchestration. Embedded AI and automation support incremental modernization without locking decisions early. Transparent pricing and faster deployment cycles.
Considerations
Smaller ecosystem than legacy platforms; integration catalog continues to grow. Benefits from clear business ownership and process clarity.
Best for
Organizations reducing tool sprawl, modernizing incrementally, and maintaining flexibility as systems and processes evolve.
Questions to ask Cyferd:
- How does your integration catalog align with our existing systems and workflows?
- What is the typical timeline from engagement to production for an organization of our size and complexity?
- How do you support scaling adoption across multiple business units or geographies?
IBM Automation Suite
Strengths
Extensive automation and AI capabilities, strong hybrid and mainframe support, enterprise-grade security, deep architectural expertise.
Considerations
Multiple product components increase coordination effort. Planning phases can extend time to value; total cost includes licenses and services.
Best for
Global enterprises with complex hybrid infrastructure and deep IBM investments.
Questions to ask IBM:
- How do the Cloud Pak components work together for end-to-end orchestration?
- What is the recommended approach for phasing implementation to accelerate time to value?
- What internal skills or external support are needed to scale the platform?
Microsoft Power Platform
Strengths
Integrates deeply with Microsoft 365, Teams, Dynamics, and Azure. Supports citizen and professional developers, large connector ecosystem.
Considerations
Capabilities spread across tools, requiring strong governance. Consumption-based pricing can be hard to forecast; visibility consolidation may require additional tools.
Best for
Microsoft-centric organizations seeking self-service automation aligned with Azure.
Questions to ask Microsoft:
- How should Power Platform deployments be governed across multiple business units?
- What is the typical cost trajectory as usage scales enterprise-wide?
- How do you handle integration with legacy or third-party systems?
Pega
Strengths
Advanced decisioning, case management, multi-channel orchestration. Strong adoption in financial services and healthcare; AI frameworks for next-best-action.
Considerations
Requires certified practitioners, long-term investment, premium pricing, and ongoing specialist involvement.
Best for
Organizations where decisioning and complex case orchestration are strategic differentiators.
Questions to ask Pega:
- How do you balance decisioning depth with deployment speed?
- What internal capabilities are needed to maintain and scale the platform?
- How does licensing scale as adoption grows across business units?
ServiceNow
Strengths
Mature ITSM and ITOM foundation, strong audit and compliance capabilities. Expanding into HR, operations, and customer workflows.
Considerations
Configuration-first approach can limit rapid experimentation; licensing scales with usage; upgrades require structured testing. Often seen as IT-centric.
Best for
Enterprises prioritizing standardization, governance, and IT service management integration.
Questions to ask ServiceNow:
- How do you support rapid prototyping for business-led initiatives?
- What is the typical timeline from concept to production for cross-functional workflows?
- How do licensing costs evolve as platform adoption scales globally?
