How to Build AI-Powered Apps That Guide Better Decisions

Niall Gallacher
In my many years developing enterprise software, one common theme has emerged: great business applications don’t just process transactions – they help and guide users in their decision-making.
Operational decision-making happens in real time, in the field, on the shop floor, and at the service desk. It is dynamic, often complex, and usually highly contextual. Yet too many enterprise systems are built as passive record-keeping tools rather than active decision enablers. This is a missed opportunity. When designed thoughtfully, enterprise software becomes more than a tool for managing operations, it becomes a platform for shaping them intelligently.
The Missing Layer: Decision Support Through Contextual Data
Operational users – whether operational managers, work planners, schedulers, dispatchers, supervisors, or customer service reps – often face a multitude of trade-offs. Do I assign the more experienced technician to the more complex job or the really urgent job? Should I expedite this shipment or consolidate it with other shipments?
These aren’t decisions that can be automated blindly. They require judgment. But this judgment needs support: timely, relevant, and contextual data. These are decisions that benefit from context: past performance, resource availability, customer history, or financial impact. But too often, the data they need is scattered throughout multiple data silos or buried in different reports.
In a recent project with a global logistics provider, we re-engineered a scheduling application. Initially, it allowed dispatchers to assign jobs based on simple availability. But we saw that experienced dispatchers were relying on spreadsheets and tribal knowledge – factoring in historical job duration, traffic patterns, driver reliability, and customer importance, all based on their experience. We integrated those data points into the app interface and gave users simple comparison tools. The result: better decisions, fewer delays, and a substantial reduction in rework.
When we provide relevant, contextual data in the moment of the decision, business applications stop being mere data entry forms and start becoming decision accelerators.
Elevating Judgment with AI
The evolution doesn’t stop at data integration. AI is redefining how business applications can support human judgment.
When paired with human expertise, AI enables three major enhancements:
- Contextual Recommendations, Not Commands
Rather than replacing decision-makers, AI augments them. It can suggest priorities, propose actions, or highlight outliers – always leaving room for human override. This is especially valuable in operational contexts where nuance and accountability matter. - Continuous Learning from Operational Feedback
As users make decisions, AI learns. Each override or acceptance becomes a data point that refines future suggestions. This feedback loop turns static software into adaptive systems that evolve with the organization. - Analyse and Summarise Unstructured Data at Scale
AI can very quickly analyse vast quantities of unstructured data and summarise the key attributes and their importance in an easy and accessible manner. When done well, this complex analysis happens seamlessly in the background and simply surfaces relevant insights at the appropriate time.
But here’s the critical point: AI only adds value when built on a foundation of clean, contextual, and well-integrated data—and when embedded into a user experience that supports trust and transparency. If users don’t understand why a recommendation was made, they won’t follow it. If the data is misaligned with their reality, they’ll work around it.
Design Principles for Decision-Centric, AI-Enabled Applications
Whether AI-driven or not, the same core principles apply:
- Map Decisions, Not Just Workflows
Identify the real moments of choice. What data and context would make those choices smarter? - Show Comparisons, Not Just Metrics
Raw data is inert. Insight emerges from contrast: against benchmarks, targets, across time, or between options. - Explain the “Why”
Especially with AI, transparency is critical. A black-box recommendation is easy to ignore. A guided suggestion with rationale is far more likely to drive behaviour. - Design for Collaboration Between Human and Machine
AI should act as a co-pilot, not a backseat driver – offering suggestions rather than commands; enhancing intuition, not replacing it.
From Software to Strategic Advantage
Enterprise leaders increasingly recognize that their systems must do more than automate, they must also assist and advise. When business applications support real-time, context-aware, and AI-augmented decision-making, they empower teams to act with greater precision and confidence.
The future of enterprise software is not transactional – it’s advisory. The organisations that get there first will be the ones whose tools don’t just record the past, but shape the next best action.
Find out more About Cyferd
New York
Americas Tower
1177 6th Avenue
5th Floor
New York
NY 10036
London
2nd Floor,
Berkeley Square House,
Berkeley Square,
London W1J 6BD
Request a Demo
Comparisons
BOAT Platform Comparison 2026
Timelines and pricing vary significantly based on scope, governance, and integration complexity.
What Is a BOAT Platform?
Business Orchestration and Automation Technology (BOAT) platforms coordinate end-to-end workflows across teams, systems, and decisions.
Unlike RPA, BPM, or point automation tools, BOAT platforms:
- Orchestrate cross-functional processes
- Integrate operational systems and data
- Embed AI-driven decision-making directly into workflows
BOAT platforms focus on how work flows across the enterprise, not just how individual tasks are automated.
Why Many Automation Initiatives Fail
Most automation programs fail due to architectural fragmentation, not poor tools.
Common challenges include:
- Siloed workflows optimised locally, not end-to-end
- Data spread across disconnected platforms
- AI added after processes are already fixed
- High coordination overhead between tools
BOAT platforms address this by aligning orchestration, automation, data, and AI within a single operational model, improving ROI and adaptability.
Enterprise BOAT Platform Comparison
Appian
Strengths
Well established in regulated industries, strong compliance, governance, and BPMN/DMN modeling. Mature partner ecosystem and support for low-code and professional development.
Considerations
9–18 month implementations, often supported by professional services. Adapting processes post-deployment can be slower in dynamic environments.
Best for
BPM-led organizations with formal governance and regulatory requirements.
Questions to ask Appian:
- How can we accelerate time to production while maintaining governance and compliance?
- What is the balance between professional services and internal capability building?
- How flexible is the platform when processes evolve unexpectedly?
Cyferd
Strengths
Built on a single, unified architecture combining workflow, automation, data, and AI. Reduces coordination overhead and enables true end-to-end orchestration. Embedded AI and automation support incremental modernization without locking decisions early. Transparent pricing and faster deployment cycles.
Considerations
Smaller ecosystem than legacy platforms; integration catalog continues to grow. Benefits from clear business ownership and process clarity.
Best for
Organizations reducing tool sprawl, modernizing incrementally, and maintaining flexibility as systems and processes evolve.
Questions to ask Cyferd:
- How does your integration catalog align with our existing systems and workflows?
- What is the typical timeline from engagement to production for an organization of our size and complexity?
- How do you support scaling adoption across multiple business units or geographies?
IBM Automation Suite
Strengths
Extensive automation and AI capabilities, strong hybrid and mainframe support, enterprise-grade security, deep architectural expertise.
Considerations
Multiple product components increase coordination effort. Planning phases can extend time to value; total cost includes licenses and services.
Best for
Global enterprises with complex hybrid infrastructure and deep IBM investments.
Questions to ask IBM:
- How do the Cloud Pak components work together for end-to-end orchestration?
- What is the recommended approach for phasing implementation to accelerate time to value?
- What internal skills or external support are needed to scale the platform?
Microsoft Power Platform
Strengths
Integrates deeply with Microsoft 365, Teams, Dynamics, and Azure. Supports citizen and professional developers, large connector ecosystem.
Considerations
Capabilities spread across tools, requiring strong governance. Consumption-based pricing can be hard to forecast; visibility consolidation may require additional tools.
Best for
Microsoft-centric organizations seeking self-service automation aligned with Azure.
Questions to ask Microsoft:
- How should Power Platform deployments be governed across multiple business units?
- What is the typical cost trajectory as usage scales enterprise-wide?
- How do you handle integration with legacy or third-party systems?
Pega
Strengths
Advanced decisioning, case management, multi-channel orchestration. Strong adoption in financial services and healthcare; AI frameworks for next-best-action.
Considerations
Requires certified practitioners, long-term investment, premium pricing, and ongoing specialist involvement.
Best for
Organizations where decisioning and complex case orchestration are strategic differentiators.
Questions to ask Pega:
- How do you balance decisioning depth with deployment speed?
- What internal capabilities are needed to maintain and scale the platform?
- How does licensing scale as adoption grows across business units?
ServiceNow
Strengths
Mature ITSM and ITOM foundation, strong audit and compliance capabilities. Expanding into HR, operations, and customer workflows.
Considerations
Configuration-first approach can limit rapid experimentation; licensing scales with usage; upgrades require structured testing. Often seen as IT-centric.
Best for
Enterprises prioritizing standardization, governance, and IT service management integration.
Questions to ask ServiceNow:
- How do you support rapid prototyping for business-led initiatives?
- What is the typical timeline from concept to production for cross-functional workflows?
- How do licensing costs evolve as platform adoption scales globally?
