AI
Help Your Team Embrace AI-Driven Process Changes
Artificial intelligence is no longer an abstract idea; it’s becoming part of everyday operations in customer service, finance, supply chains, and beyond. For many organizations, AI-driven process changes are designed to simplify work and improve outcomes. But there’s a practical challenge that often gets overlooked: helping people adjust to the changes.
Not everyone greets new technology with open arms. Some employees may worry about job security, others may feel overwhelmed by learning something unfamiliar, and a few may simply not see the point. For managers leading large teams in operations or customer service, this resistance can slow down adoption and reduce the impact of new tools.
Helping a team embrace change takes more than switching systems on and expecting people to adapt. It requires careful communication, training, and leadership that puts people first. Below are some practical ways to guide teams through AI-driven process change, based on challenges we hear regularly from organizations making this shift.
Acknowledge the Human Side of Change
Resistance to change is normal. It doesn’t mean your team is against innovation; it often means they don’t yet see the purpose behind it. When people feel changes are being imposed without context, frustration grows. Taking time to explain why AI-driven processes are being introduced can make the transition smoother.
For example, if AI is introduced to streamline case management in customer service, frame it as a way to handle high volumes more effectively and reduce stress during peak times. If it’s being applied in operations, position it as a safeguard to spot issues before they escalate, rather than an audit on performance.
It’s important to acknowledge concerns directly rather than brushing them aside. Employees who feel heard are far more likely to stay engaged. Managers can use town halls, one-to-one conversations, or team briefings to create space for these discussions.
When people understand the why, they’re more likely to give the how a chance.
Communicate Benefits in Practical Terms
One of the biggest missteps leaders make is leaning on broad promises about “efficiency” or “innovation.” While these words may sound compelling in strategy documents, they rarely resonate on the front line. Teams want to know how the change impacts their day-to-day responsibilities.
Practical examples are powerful:
-
“Instead of manually tracking cases, this system will flag priority issues automatically.”
-
“You’ll spend less time on data entry and more time solving customer problems.”
-
“If there’s a disruption in the supply chain, AI will alert us sooner so we can act before customers are affected.”
By tying AI directly to tasks people already perform, you reduce uncertainty and highlight the personal benefits. Another useful tactic is to demonstrate time savings. If AI automation can cut a repetitive process from two hours to 20 minutes, share that number. Tangible evidence builds trust.
Framing AI as an assistant (rather than a replacement) can ease concerns and make it clear that the technology is here to support, not take over.
Involve the Team Early and Often
Adoption works best when people feel they have a voice in the process. Too often, teams are only informed of new technology when it is ready to launch. At that point, their only option is to comply, and resistance grows.
Involving employees earlier, through feedback sessions, pilot programs, or workshops, creates ownership. It also surfaces practical insights leaders may overlook. A process that looks efficient on paper may not reflect the realities of day-to-day work. Hearing directly from employees helps avoid these blind spots.
Identifying “champions” can also accelerate adoption. Champions are colleagues who are naturally enthusiastic about AI and willing to support others as they learn. Because their influence comes from shared experience rather than authority, they can break down barriers that managers may struggle with.
Adoption is not a one-off event; it’s a process of continual refinement. Keeping feedback loops open after launch ensures issues are addressed quickly, maintaining trust and momentum.
Support Skills and Confidence
For some employees, digital illiteracy is the biggest barrier to change. Even basic tasks, like navigating dashboards or interpreting automated outputs, can feel daunting if people lack confidence. Left unaddressed, this creates frustration and widens the gap between those who adapt quickly and those who lag behind.
Offering simple, role-specific training makes a significant difference. The key is to keep it practical. Show employees how AI integrates into their existing workflow, rather than overwhelming them with every feature at once. Microlearning modules, short videos, or hands-on sessions tend to work better than long manuals or abstract presentations.
Peer support is also effective. Pairing less confident employees with early adopters creates a safe environment for questions and helps knowledge spread naturally across the team.
Over time, as confidence grows, the technology moves from being a source of stress to a natural part of the job.
Build a Culture of Continuous Learning
AI will keep evolving, which means processes will too. A rollout that feels significant today may look different six months from now. Setting the expectation that change is ongoing helps prevent fatigue and resistance later.
Encourage your team to approach AI as an ongoing journey rather than a one-time shift. Managers can reinforce this by:
-
Normalizing experimentation, where employees can test features without fear of mistakes.
-
Sharing small but meaningful improvements (e.g., “response times improved by 15% this quarter”).
-
Recognizing individuals or teams who use AI creatively to solve problems.
Celebrating wins, whether time saved, errors reduced, or customers served more quickly, helps teams see the real impact of change. These moments turn abstract ideas into lived benefits, which fuels long-term adoption.
Lead by Example
Change starts at the top. If managers and leaders actively use AI-driven processes, it signals to the team that these tools are worth investing time in.
For instance, if a manager consistently refers to insights generated by AI when making decisions, employees see the technology as integral to how the business operates. If leaders avoid the tools, teams quickly assume they’re optional.
Visibility matters. Even small actions, like using AI-powered reports in meetings or acknowledging how automation made a process smoother, reinforce adoption. Leaders don’t need to be experts, but they do need to demonstrate commitment.
Closing Thoughts
AI-driven process change is as much about people as it is about technology. Tools may automate tasks and provide insights, but without employee adoption, their potential is limited. By focusing on communication, training, and visible leadership, managers can reduce resistance and help teams transition more effectively.
Find out more About Cyferd
New York
Americas Tower
1177 6th Avenue
5th Floor
New York
NY 10036
London
2nd Floor,
Berkeley Square House,
Berkeley Square,
London W1J 6BD
Request a Demo
Comparisons
BOAT Platform Comparison 2026
Timelines and pricing vary significantly based on scope, governance, and integration complexity.
What Is a BOAT Platform?
Business Orchestration and Automation Technology (BOAT) platforms coordinate end-to-end workflows across teams, systems, and decisions.
Unlike RPA, BPM, or point automation tools, BOAT platforms:
- Orchestrate cross-functional processes
- Integrate operational systems and data
- Embed AI-driven decision-making directly into workflows
BOAT platforms focus on how work flows across the enterprise, not just how individual tasks are automated.
Why Many Automation Initiatives Fail
Most automation programs fail due to architectural fragmentation, not poor tools.
Common challenges include:
- Siloed workflows optimised locally, not end-to-end
- Data spread across disconnected platforms
- AI added after processes are already fixed
- High coordination overhead between tools
BOAT platforms address this by aligning orchestration, automation, data, and AI within a single operational model, improving ROI and adaptability.
Enterprise BOAT Platform Comparison
Appian
Strengths
Well established in regulated industries, strong compliance, governance, and BPMN/DMN modeling. Mature partner ecosystem and support for low-code and professional development.
Considerations
9–18 month implementations, often supported by professional services. Adapting processes post-deployment can be slower in dynamic environments.
Best for
BPM-led organizations with formal governance and regulatory requirements.
Questions to ask Appian:
- How can we accelerate time to production while maintaining governance and compliance?
- What is the balance between professional services and internal capability building?
- How flexible is the platform when processes evolve unexpectedly?
Cyferd
Strengths
Built on a single, unified architecture combining workflow, automation, data, and AI. Reduces coordination overhead and enables true end-to-end orchestration. Embedded AI and automation support incremental modernization without locking decisions early. Transparent pricing and faster deployment cycles.
Considerations
Smaller ecosystem than legacy platforms; integration catalog continues to grow. Benefits from clear business ownership and process clarity.
Best for
Organizations reducing tool sprawl, modernizing incrementally, and maintaining flexibility as systems and processes evolve.
Questions to ask Cyferd:
- How does your integration catalog align with our existing systems and workflows?
- What is the typical timeline from engagement to production for an organization of our size and complexity?
- How do you support scaling adoption across multiple business units or geographies?
IBM Automation Suite
Strengths
Extensive automation and AI capabilities, strong hybrid and mainframe support, enterprise-grade security, deep architectural expertise.
Considerations
Multiple product components increase coordination effort. Planning phases can extend time to value; total cost includes licenses and services.
Best for
Global enterprises with complex hybrid infrastructure and deep IBM investments.
Questions to ask IBM:
- How do the Cloud Pak components work together for end-to-end orchestration?
- What is the recommended approach for phasing implementation to accelerate time to value?
- What internal skills or external support are needed to scale the platform?
Microsoft Power Platform
Strengths
Integrates deeply with Microsoft 365, Teams, Dynamics, and Azure. Supports citizen and professional developers, large connector ecosystem.
Considerations
Capabilities spread across tools, requiring strong governance. Consumption-based pricing can be hard to forecast; visibility consolidation may require additional tools.
Best for
Microsoft-centric organizations seeking self-service automation aligned with Azure.
Questions to ask Microsoft:
- How should Power Platform deployments be governed across multiple business units?
- What is the typical cost trajectory as usage scales enterprise-wide?
- How do you handle integration with legacy or third-party systems?
Pega
Strengths
Advanced decisioning, case management, multi-channel orchestration. Strong adoption in financial services and healthcare; AI frameworks for next-best-action.
Considerations
Requires certified practitioners, long-term investment, premium pricing, and ongoing specialist involvement.
Best for
Organizations where decisioning and complex case orchestration are strategic differentiators.
Questions to ask Pega:
- How do you balance decisioning depth with deployment speed?
- What internal capabilities are needed to maintain and scale the platform?
- How does licensing scale as adoption grows across business units?
ServiceNow
Strengths
Mature ITSM and ITOM foundation, strong audit and compliance capabilities. Expanding into HR, operations, and customer workflows.
Considerations
Configuration-first approach can limit rapid experimentation; licensing scales with usage; upgrades require structured testing. Often seen as IT-centric.
Best for
Enterprises prioritizing standardization, governance, and IT service management integration.
Questions to ask ServiceNow:
- How do you support rapid prototyping for business-led initiatives?
- What is the typical timeline from concept to production for cross-functional workflows?
- How do licensing costs evolve as platform adoption scales globally?
