Business
Fix the Flow: How to Unblock Broken Business Processes Fast
Every enterprise experiences it at some point: approvals stuck in inboxes, operations running on spreadsheets, and teams slowed by disconnected systems. These broken workflows aren’t just frustrating—they cost time, efficiency, and agility.
Fixing the flow isn’t about endless planning or major system overhauls. It’s about recognizing bottlenecks, acting quickly, and building processes that work for your people and your business.
Why Workflows Break
Workflows break for a few predictable reasons:
-
Manual processes and spreadsheets: What starts as a quick fix often becomes a long-term bottleneck. Spreadsheets might seem easy at first, but when multiple teams rely on them, errors multiply and visibility disappears.
-
Siloed systems: When departments operate in isolation, data isn’t shared, decisions are delayed, and collaboration suffers. A simple approval can get stuck because one team doesn’t have access to another system.
-
Lack of visibility and accountability: Without clear ownership and transparency, tasks slip through the cracks. Managers may not know where delays occur until it’s too late.
The impact is real: lost productivity, missed deadlines, frustrated employees, and even revenue leakage. Enterprises can’t afford to let inefficiency linger.
Example: In one organization, purchase approvals could take weeks because requests were sent via email, manually tracked, and frequently misplaced between teams. The result? Delays in getting critical supplies and growing frustration across departments.
Signs Your Flow is Broken
Not sure if your workflows are holding you back? Watch for these warning signs:
-
Repeated delays in approvals or decision-making.
-
Teams duplicating work because systems aren’t connected.
-
Data inconsistencies that require constant manual correction.
-
Friction in processes that should be simple.
-
Over-reliance on email chains or spreadsheets for core processes.
If any of these feel familiar, it’s time to audit your workflows and take action. Even small fixes can create a significant impact on speed, accuracy, and team morale.
How to Fix the Flow
Fixing broken processes doesn’t have to be complicated. Focus on these steps:
-
Identify bottlenecks: Look for repetitive delays, errors, or areas of confusion. Speak to your team—they often know exactly where the process breaks down.
-
Map your workflows: Visualize how work moves across teams and systems. Flowcharts or process diagrams can reveal inefficiencies invisible in daily operations.
-
Prioritize high-impact fixes: Not every problem needs a full-scale solution. Target the areas where improvements will make the biggest difference fast.
-
Implement scalable solutions: Technology can connect systems, automate repetitive tasks, and provide intelligent insights. The goal isn’t just to fix one process but to create systems that adapt as your business evolves.
-
Monitor and iterate: Workflows aren’t static. Continuously optimize to maintain efficiency, improve team collaboration, and ensure processes remain aligned with business goals.
Tip: Start small. Fixing a single bottleneck in a critical process can create momentum and inspire broader improvements across the organization.
The Role of Technology
Modern solutions make workflow improvement faster and more effective:
-
System integration: Break down silos and make data flow seamlessly across departments. When teams see the same real-time information, decisions happen faster and with more confidence.
-
Automation: Reduce repetitive work and free your team to focus on higher-value tasks. For example, automatic invoice approvals or notifications can save hours each week.
-
AI-enhanced insights: Intelligent tools can highlight bottlenecks and predict where delays may occur, allowing you to act proactively rather than reactively.
The right technology doesn’t just fix a single process—it enables a culture of continuous improvement, helping businesses scale efficiently without adding complexity.
Benefits of a Smooth Flow
When workflows are fixed, the results are tangible:
-
Faster decision-making: Information moves quickly, approvals are streamlined, and teams can act without waiting for email chains.
-
Increased productivity: Teams spend less time on repetitive tasks and more time delivering value.
-
Better collaboration: Integrated systems and clear workflows make cross-functional teamwork seamless.
-
Reduced operational risk: Fewer errors, consistent processes, and clear ownership reduce the chances of mistakes slipping through.
-
Real business outcomes: Cost savings, faster time-to-market, improved employee satisfaction, and a more agile business overall.
Example: A financial services firm reduced its reporting cycle from 10 days to 3 by integrating multiple data sources and automating repetitive reconciliations. The result? Faster client reporting and more strategic time for analysts.
Conclusion
Broken workflows are common—but solvable. Fixing the flow starts with acknowledging bottlenecks, taking action quickly, and creating processes that can evolve with your business.
Start by asking yourself: where is your workflow stuck today, and what’s the first step to fixing it? The sooner you address it, the sooner your teams can move freely, focus on value, and drive meaningful results.
Efficiency doesn’t have to be a distant goal. By fixing your workflows, you unlock speed, clarity, and agility—and position your business to thrive in a fast-moving world.
Find out more About Cyferd
New York
Americas Tower
1177 6th Avenue
5th Floor
New York
NY 10036
London
2nd Floor,
Berkeley Square House,
Berkeley Square,
London W1J 6BD
Request a Demo
Comparisons
BOAT Platform Comparison 2026
Timelines and pricing vary significantly based on scope, governance, and integration complexity.
What Is a BOAT Platform?
Business Orchestration and Automation Technology (BOAT) platforms coordinate end-to-end workflows across teams, systems, and decisions.
Unlike RPA, BPM, or point automation tools, BOAT platforms:
- Orchestrate cross-functional processes
- Integrate operational systems and data
- Embed AI-driven decision-making directly into workflows
BOAT platforms focus on how work flows across the enterprise, not just how individual tasks are automated.
Why Many Automation Initiatives Fail
Most automation programs fail due to architectural fragmentation, not poor tools.
Common challenges include:
- Siloed workflows optimised locally, not end-to-end
- Data spread across disconnected platforms
- AI added after processes are already fixed
- High coordination overhead between tools
BOAT platforms address this by aligning orchestration, automation, data, and AI within a single operational model, improving ROI and adaptability.
Enterprise BOAT Platform Comparison
Appian
Strengths
Well established in regulated industries, strong compliance, governance, and BPMN/DMN modeling. Mature partner ecosystem and support for low-code and professional development.
Considerations
9–18 month implementations, often supported by professional services. Adapting processes post-deployment can be slower in dynamic environments.
Best for
BPM-led organizations with formal governance and regulatory requirements.
Questions to ask Appian:
- How can we accelerate time to production while maintaining governance and compliance?
- What is the balance between professional services and internal capability building?
- How flexible is the platform when processes evolve unexpectedly?
Cyferd
Strengths
Built on a single, unified architecture combining workflow, automation, data, and AI. Reduces coordination overhead and enables true end-to-end orchestration. Embedded AI and automation support incremental modernization without locking decisions early. Transparent pricing and faster deployment cycles.
Considerations
Smaller ecosystem than legacy platforms; integration catalog continues to grow. Benefits from clear business ownership and process clarity.
Best for
Organizations reducing tool sprawl, modernizing incrementally, and maintaining flexibility as systems and processes evolve.
Questions to ask Cyferd:
- How does your integration catalog align with our existing systems and workflows?
- What is the typical timeline from engagement to production for an organization of our size and complexity?
- How do you support scaling adoption across multiple business units or geographies?
IBM Automation Suite
Strengths
Extensive automation and AI capabilities, strong hybrid and mainframe support, enterprise-grade security, deep architectural expertise.
Considerations
Multiple product components increase coordination effort. Planning phases can extend time to value; total cost includes licenses and services.
Best for
Global enterprises with complex hybrid infrastructure and deep IBM investments.
Questions to ask IBM:
- How do the Cloud Pak components work together for end-to-end orchestration?
- What is the recommended approach for phasing implementation to accelerate time to value?
- What internal skills or external support are needed to scale the platform?
Microsoft Power Platform
Strengths
Integrates deeply with Microsoft 365, Teams, Dynamics, and Azure. Supports citizen and professional developers, large connector ecosystem.
Considerations
Capabilities spread across tools, requiring strong governance. Consumption-based pricing can be hard to forecast; visibility consolidation may require additional tools.
Best for
Microsoft-centric organizations seeking self-service automation aligned with Azure.
Questions to ask Microsoft:
- How should Power Platform deployments be governed across multiple business units?
- What is the typical cost trajectory as usage scales enterprise-wide?
- How do you handle integration with legacy or third-party systems?
Pega
Strengths
Advanced decisioning, case management, multi-channel orchestration. Strong adoption in financial services and healthcare; AI frameworks for next-best-action.
Considerations
Requires certified practitioners, long-term investment, premium pricing, and ongoing specialist involvement.
Best for
Organizations where decisioning and complex case orchestration are strategic differentiators.
Questions to ask Pega:
- How do you balance decisioning depth with deployment speed?
- What internal capabilities are needed to maintain and scale the platform?
- How does licensing scale as adoption grows across business units?
ServiceNow
Strengths
Mature ITSM and ITOM foundation, strong audit and compliance capabilities. Expanding into HR, operations, and customer workflows.
Considerations
Configuration-first approach can limit rapid experimentation; licensing scales with usage; upgrades require structured testing. Often seen as IT-centric.
Best for
Enterprises prioritizing standardization, governance, and IT service management integration.
Questions to ask ServiceNow:
- How do you support rapid prototyping for business-led initiatives?
- What is the typical timeline from concept to production for cross-functional workflows?
- How do licensing costs evolve as platform adoption scales globally?
