Business
How to Be a Digital Vanguard: CIO Priorities for 2025
Introduction
Every CIO today faces the same challenge: bridging the gap between digital ambition and real business outcomes. According to Gartner’s 2025 CIO & Technology Executive Survey, only 48% of digital initiatives meet or exceed their intended goals. That means more than half of transformations stall, underdeliver, or fail to scale.
But there’s a new class of leaders—what Gartner calls the Digital Vanguard. These organizations have found a better way to lead transformation, co-owning digital delivery with the business. The results speak for themselves: a 71% success rate, far outperforming the rest (The National CIO Review).
So what makes a Digital Vanguard, and how can today’s CIOs join their ranks? Let’s break it down.
What Sets the Digital Vanguard Apart
The biggest differentiator isn’t a new piece of technology—it’s a new way of working.
Digital Vanguard CIOs don’t operate in silos. They share accountability with business leaders, meeting with their counterparts four times more frequently than their peers. And while most companies involve just 21% of non-IT staff in digital initiatives, Vanguards engage 35% or more (The National CIO Review).
This co-ownership model creates stronger alignment, faster feedback loops, and better adoption across the enterprise. In other words, success isn’t just “delivered by IT”—it’s owned by the business.
Strategic Investment Shifts
Technology budgets reveal another difference. CIOs everywhere are shifting resources toward modern, agile solutions, but Digital Vanguards do it with sharper focus.
In 2025, over 80% of CIOs expect to increase investment in:
-
Artificial intelligence (AI) for insight and automation
-
Cybersecurity to safeguard growing digital ecosystems
-
Business intelligence to unlock value from data
-
APIs for seamless integration
At the same time, they’re deliberately reducing spend on legacy infrastructure (Gartner). The Vanguard mindset isn’t about cutting costs—it’s about freeing resources for innovation.
Developing Digital Skills Across the Enterprise
Technology alone isn’t enough. For digital transformation to scale, skills need to spread beyond IT.
Yet, only 16% of CIOs currently plan to build digital skills across the wider enterprise (The National CIO Review). That’s a missed opportunity. Digital Vanguards stand out by actively developing new capabilities among non-IT teams.
This might mean teaching business users the basics of data analysis, embedding product management skills in departments, or training staff to co-design applications. When the whole organization is digitally literate, innovation doesn’t bottleneck at IT’s door.
Democratizing Innovation
Digital Vanguards empower their teams with tools that make innovation accessible. Platforms that allow drag-and-drop app building or workflow automation—without deep coding knowledge—are critical here.
By giving employees across the business the means to solve their own challenges, CIOs unlock creativity and accelerate outcomes.
At Cyferd, we see this firsthand: when organizations move beyond rigid legacy systems and put adaptable, user-friendly tools in people’s hands, transformation stops being a project—it becomes a habit.
Driving Success Through Shared Leadership
Only 18% of CIOs currently plan to make collaborative leadership a top priority in 2025 (The National CIO Review). That’s surprising—because the Digital Vanguards show that this is exactly what makes transformation stick.
When CIOs and business leaders co-lead, decisions are faster, adoption is smoother, and outcomes are more meaningful. It’s less about IT “serving the business” and more about leading the business together.
Becoming a Digital Vanguard: A Practical Path
So how can CIOs start moving in this direction? Here’s a roadmap:
- Commit to co-ownership – Set up regular strategy sessions with business leaders. Make digital delivery a shared responsibility.
- Reallocate budgets smartly – Invest in AI, cybersecurity, and integration while tapering spend on legacy systems.
- Upskill beyond IT – Build digital literacy in every department to reduce dependency and increase resilience.
- Adopt democratized platforms – Provide flexible, accessible tools so business teams can innovate independently.
- Redefine success metrics – Measure transformation by business outcomes, not just IT deliverables.
Conclusion
The message is clear: the traditional IT-centric model isn’t enough. Digital transformation succeeds when CIOs move beyond ownership and embrace co-leadership.
The difference is stark: 48% success rate vs. 71% (Gartner). Digital Vanguards are proof that when the business shares responsibility, transformation accelerates and outcomes improve.
Becoming a Digital Vanguard isn’t about adopting every new technology – it’s about reshaping how IT and business work together. Co-own, co-lead, and co-create. That’s how CIOs can drive transformation that lasts.
At Cyferd, we help organizations remove the barriers to becoming Digital Vanguards. Our cloud platform empowers teams to build, integrate, and deploy adaptive applications without the usual complexity—bridging the gap between IT and business.
Find out more About Cyferd
New York
Americas Tower
1177 6th Avenue
5th Floor
New York
NY 10036
London
2nd Floor,
Berkeley Square House,
Berkeley Square,
London W1J 6BD
Request a Demo
Comparisons
BOAT Platform Comparison 2026
Timelines and pricing vary significantly based on scope, governance, and integration complexity.
What Is a BOAT Platform?
Business Orchestration and Automation Technology (BOAT) platforms coordinate end-to-end workflows across teams, systems, and decisions.
Unlike RPA, BPM, or point automation tools, BOAT platforms:
- Orchestrate cross-functional processes
- Integrate operational systems and data
- Embed AI-driven decision-making directly into workflows
BOAT platforms focus on how work flows across the enterprise, not just how individual tasks are automated.
Why Many Automation Initiatives Fail
Most automation programs fail due to architectural fragmentation, not poor tools.
Common challenges include:
- Siloed workflows optimised locally, not end-to-end
- Data spread across disconnected platforms
- AI added after processes are already fixed
- High coordination overhead between tools
BOAT platforms address this by aligning orchestration, automation, data, and AI within a single operational model, improving ROI and adaptability.
Enterprise BOAT Platform Comparison
Appian
Strengths
Well established in regulated industries, strong compliance, governance, and BPMN/DMN modeling. Mature partner ecosystem and support for low-code and professional development.
Considerations
9–18 month implementations, often supported by professional services. Adapting processes post-deployment can be slower in dynamic environments.
Best for
BPM-led organizations with formal governance and regulatory requirements.
Questions to ask Appian:
- How can we accelerate time to production while maintaining governance and compliance?
- What is the balance between professional services and internal capability building?
- How flexible is the platform when processes evolve unexpectedly?
Cyferd
Strengths
Built on a single, unified architecture combining workflow, automation, data, and AI. Reduces coordination overhead and enables true end-to-end orchestration. Embedded AI and automation support incremental modernization without locking decisions early. Transparent pricing and faster deployment cycles.
Considerations
Smaller ecosystem than legacy platforms; integration catalog continues to grow. Benefits from clear business ownership and process clarity.
Best for
Organizations reducing tool sprawl, modernizing incrementally, and maintaining flexibility as systems and processes evolve.
Questions to ask Cyferd:
- How does your integration catalog align with our existing systems and workflows?
- What is the typical timeline from engagement to production for an organization of our size and complexity?
- How do you support scaling adoption across multiple business units or geographies?
IBM Automation Suite
Strengths
Extensive automation and AI capabilities, strong hybrid and mainframe support, enterprise-grade security, deep architectural expertise.
Considerations
Multiple product components increase coordination effort. Planning phases can extend time to value; total cost includes licenses and services.
Best for
Global enterprises with complex hybrid infrastructure and deep IBM investments.
Questions to ask IBM:
- How do the Cloud Pak components work together for end-to-end orchestration?
- What is the recommended approach for phasing implementation to accelerate time to value?
- What internal skills or external support are needed to scale the platform?
Microsoft Power Platform
Strengths
Integrates deeply with Microsoft 365, Teams, Dynamics, and Azure. Supports citizen and professional developers, large connector ecosystem.
Considerations
Capabilities spread across tools, requiring strong governance. Consumption-based pricing can be hard to forecast; visibility consolidation may require additional tools.
Best for
Microsoft-centric organizations seeking self-service automation aligned with Azure.
Questions to ask Microsoft:
- How should Power Platform deployments be governed across multiple business units?
- What is the typical cost trajectory as usage scales enterprise-wide?
- How do you handle integration with legacy or third-party systems?
Pega
Strengths
Advanced decisioning, case management, multi-channel orchestration. Strong adoption in financial services and healthcare; AI frameworks for next-best-action.
Considerations
Requires certified practitioners, long-term investment, premium pricing, and ongoing specialist involvement.
Best for
Organizations where decisioning and complex case orchestration are strategic differentiators.
Questions to ask Pega:
- How do you balance decisioning depth with deployment speed?
- What internal capabilities are needed to maintain and scale the platform?
- How does licensing scale as adoption grows across business units?
ServiceNow
Strengths
Mature ITSM and ITOM foundation, strong audit and compliance capabilities. Expanding into HR, operations, and customer workflows.
Considerations
Configuration-first approach can limit rapid experimentation; licensing scales with usage; upgrades require structured testing. Often seen as IT-centric.
Best for
Enterprises prioritizing standardization, governance, and IT service management integration.
Questions to ask ServiceNow:
- How do you support rapid prototyping for business-led initiatives?
- What is the typical timeline from concept to production for cross-functional workflows?
- How do licensing costs evolve as platform adoption scales globally?
