Business
Fixing the Fragmented Stack: How to Break Free from Software Overload
Take a look at your current tech stack.
Now ask yourself:
How many tools are you really using?
And more importantly — how many are working together?
For most businesses, the answer is… not many.
Over the years, software has crept in from every direction — a CRM here, a procurement tool there, a time-saving Excel macro that somehow became mission-critical. Before you know it, your business is being held together with duct tape and middleware.
Sound familiar? You’re not alone.
The Rise of the Messy Stack
It didn’t happen overnight. Every department needed its own system. Vendors promised quick wins. Integration “was coming.” And in the absence of a central strategy, software just piled up.
- One tool to track vendors.
- One tool to log incidents.
- A few leftover legacy systems.
- And half the business still lives in spreadsheets.
This is what fragmentation looks like. And while it may seem manageable on the surface, it’s costing your business more than you think.
What Fragmentation Really Costs You
Let’s break it down.
When your systems don’t talk to each other, you get:
- Duplicate data
- Disconnected workflows
- A patchwork of expensive integrations
- Siloed teams and siloed insights
And then there’s the hidden cost — the manual workarounds.
How many hours are your people spending exporting, cleaning, and uploading data from one place to another? How many critical tasks are still running on email chains and shared drives?
That’s time (and talent) your business isn’t getting back.
Worse still, as every system now tries to bolt on its own AI layer, you end up with siloed intelligence — which means more to manage, more to audit, and more complexity.
“Let’s Just Replace It” Doesn’t Work
The natural instinct is to swap one app for another. Maybe something newer, shinier, with better UX.
But replacing software one-to-one doesn’t fix the underlying issue. It just kicks the can down the road.
Even big ERP systems — the so-called “one platform to rule them all” — often fall short. Customizing them is time-consuming, upgrading them is painful, and trying to stretch them into something they’re not? That’s a fast track to frustration.
So What’s the Alternative?
Let’s rethink the problem.
What if, instead of replacing everything or endlessly stitching things together, you started simplifying?
Not by cutting — but by consolidating.
Imagine a platform that:
- Integrates into your existing systems
- Lets you build exactly what you need — fast
- Keeps your data unified and reusable
- Reduces your reliance on spreadsheets, bolt-ons, and workarounds
- Scales with you, app by app, use case by use case
Now imagine doing all that without racking up more vendors, contracts, and support bills.
Enter: Strategic Simplicity
With a unified, composable platform like Cyferd, you can start small — pick a single process that’s broken or manual — and build from there.
Let’s say you want to extend your CRM. Maybe quoting is messy, or approvals are slow. Instead of shoehorning it into Salesforce or buying another SaaS tool, you can build a tailored workflow in Cyferd that:
- Pulls the necessary data from your CRM
- Handles quotes, discounts, approvals
- Keeps everything linked, but doesn’t duplicate anything
And then? You reuse that same data to build the next thing. Maybe it’s vendor risk scoring. Or supply chain project tracking. Or automating a recurring audit process.
Every new solution slots into the same ecosystem — not a separate silo.
Innovation Without the Wait
One of the biggest blockers to innovation is bureaucracy. Legal reviews. Vendor onboarding. Change boards. Security audits.
Cyferd cuts through all that.
Have an idea? You can prototype it in days.
If it works, scale it.
If it doesn’t, move on — no harm done.
That agility is gold in a business landscape where speed is everything.
It’s Not About Replacing Everything. It’s About Replacing What Doesn’t Work.
To be clear: this isn’t about throwing out your ERP or ripping up your tech stack. It’s about using your existing systems smarter — and augmenting them where they fall short.
You don’t need to build your own ERP.
You don’t need to keep patching broken tools together.
You just need a more strategic foundation to build from.
The Bottom Line
Fragmentation isn’t just a technical problem — it’s a business one.
It slows you down, drains your resources, and holds your teams back.
But it doesn’t have to.
Strategic simplicity isn’t just a nice idea — it’s a competitive advantage. And it starts by rethinking how you approach your stack.
Find out more About Cyferd
New York
Americas Tower
1177 6th Avenue
5th Floor
New York
NY 10036
London
2nd Floor,
Berkeley Square House,
Berkeley Square,
London W1J 6BD
Request a Demo
Comparisons
BOAT Platform Comparison 2026
Timelines and pricing vary significantly based on scope, governance, and integration complexity.
What Is a BOAT Platform?
Business Orchestration and Automation Technology (BOAT) platforms coordinate end-to-end workflows across teams, systems, and decisions.
Unlike RPA, BPM, or point automation tools, BOAT platforms:
- Orchestrate cross-functional processes
- Integrate operational systems and data
- Embed AI-driven decision-making directly into workflows
BOAT platforms focus on how work flows across the enterprise, not just how individual tasks are automated.
Why Many Automation Initiatives Fail
Most automation programs fail due to architectural fragmentation, not poor tools.
Common challenges include:
- Siloed workflows optimised locally, not end-to-end
- Data spread across disconnected platforms
- AI added after processes are already fixed
- High coordination overhead between tools
BOAT platforms address this by aligning orchestration, automation, data, and AI within a single operational model, improving ROI and adaptability.
Enterprise BOAT Platform Comparison
Appian
Strengths
Well established in regulated industries, strong compliance, governance, and BPMN/DMN modeling. Mature partner ecosystem and support for low-code and professional development.
Considerations
9–18 month implementations, often supported by professional services. Adapting processes post-deployment can be slower in dynamic environments.
Best for
BPM-led organizations with formal governance and regulatory requirements.
Questions to ask Appian:
- How can we accelerate time to production while maintaining governance and compliance?
- What is the balance between professional services and internal capability building?
- How flexible is the platform when processes evolve unexpectedly?
Cyferd
Strengths
Built on a single, unified architecture combining workflow, automation, data, and AI. Reduces coordination overhead and enables true end-to-end orchestration. Embedded AI and automation support incremental modernization without locking decisions early. Transparent pricing and faster deployment cycles.
Considerations
Smaller ecosystem than legacy platforms; integration catalog continues to grow. Benefits from clear business ownership and process clarity.
Best for
Organizations reducing tool sprawl, modernizing incrementally, and maintaining flexibility as systems and processes evolve.
Questions to ask Cyferd:
- How does your integration catalog align with our existing systems and workflows?
- What is the typical timeline from engagement to production for an organization of our size and complexity?
- How do you support scaling adoption across multiple business units or geographies?
IBM Automation Suite
Strengths
Extensive automation and AI capabilities, strong hybrid and mainframe support, enterprise-grade security, deep architectural expertise.
Considerations
Multiple product components increase coordination effort. Planning phases can extend time to value; total cost includes licenses and services.
Best for
Global enterprises with complex hybrid infrastructure and deep IBM investments.
Questions to ask IBM:
- How do the Cloud Pak components work together for end-to-end orchestration?
- What is the recommended approach for phasing implementation to accelerate time to value?
- What internal skills or external support are needed to scale the platform?
Microsoft Power Platform
Strengths
Integrates deeply with Microsoft 365, Teams, Dynamics, and Azure. Supports citizen and professional developers, large connector ecosystem.
Considerations
Capabilities spread across tools, requiring strong governance. Consumption-based pricing can be hard to forecast; visibility consolidation may require additional tools.
Best for
Microsoft-centric organizations seeking self-service automation aligned with Azure.
Questions to ask Microsoft:
- How should Power Platform deployments be governed across multiple business units?
- What is the typical cost trajectory as usage scales enterprise-wide?
- How do you handle integration with legacy or third-party systems?
Pega
Strengths
Advanced decisioning, case management, multi-channel orchestration. Strong adoption in financial services and healthcare; AI frameworks for next-best-action.
Considerations
Requires certified practitioners, long-term investment, premium pricing, and ongoing specialist involvement.
Best for
Organizations where decisioning and complex case orchestration are strategic differentiators.
Questions to ask Pega:
- How do you balance decisioning depth with deployment speed?
- What internal capabilities are needed to maintain and scale the platform?
- How does licensing scale as adoption grows across business units?
ServiceNow
Strengths
Mature ITSM and ITOM foundation, strong audit and compliance capabilities. Expanding into HR, operations, and customer workflows.
Considerations
Configuration-first approach can limit rapid experimentation; licensing scales with usage; upgrades require structured testing. Often seen as IT-centric.
Best for
Enterprises prioritizing standardization, governance, and IT service management integration.
Questions to ask ServiceNow:
- How do you support rapid prototyping for business-led initiatives?
- What is the typical timeline from concept to production for cross-functional workflows?
- How do licensing costs evolve as platform adoption scales globally?
