Cost Benefits of Cyferd
What are the cost benefits of migrating to Cyferd?
Large enterprises are continually searching for effective ways to optimize costs and enhance efficiency. Cyferd, a revolutionary platform, is transforming the way businesses operate globally. By leveraging Cyferd’s capabilities, organizations can unlock significant cost savings and drive impactful improvements across their operations. Here’s how migrating to Cyferd can reshape your organization’s bottom line and pave the way for sustainable success.
Slashing IT Infrastructure Costs
One of the most immediate and tangible benefits of migrating to Cyferd is the substantial reduction in IT infrastructure costs. As a cloud-based platform, Cyferd enables organizations to:
- Consolidate multiple applications onto a single, unified platform, significantly cutting down on infrastructure and licensing expenses.
- Eliminate the need for costly on-premises hardware and its associated maintenance.
- Optimize cloud spend by scaling resources up or down based on actual needs, ensuring you only pay for what you use.
Dramatically Lower Development and Maintenance Costs
Cyferd’s innovative approach to application development and maintenance offers a paradigm shift in cost-efficiency:
- Rapid application development without coding allows for creating solutions without the need for expensive coding resources.
- Faster time-to-market for new solutions means quicker ROI and competitive advantage.
- Reduced ongoing maintenance and update costs compared to traditional software development methods.
Operational Cost Savings Through Enhanced Efficiency
By streamlining operations, Cyferd drives significant cost savings across the organization:
- Automation of routine tasks and workflows frees up staff time for more value-added activities.
- Streamlined processes reduce manual errors and rework, cutting down on unnecessary costs.
- Improved data accessibility and insights lead to better decision-making, optimizing resource allocation.
Vendor Consolidation: Simplifying Your Tech Stack
Replacing multiple point solutions with Cyferd’s unified platform offers several cost advantages:
- Reduce the number of software vendors, simplifying management and reducing associated costs.
- Streamline procurement and contract management processes.
- Decrease training and support costs across disparate systems, improving overall efficiency.
Value-Based Pricing Model: A New Approach to Software Costs
Cyferd’s innovative pricing model provides additional cost benefits:
- Utility/value-based pricing instead of traditional per-user licensing models.
- Ability to standardize value-add tools across the organization without restrictive user limits.
- Elimination of unnecessary overhead and technical debt associated with legacy pricing models.
Transforming Cost Structures with Cyferd
By providing a flexible, AI-powered platform that unifies data and applications, Cyferd enables large enterprises to significantly reduce their total cost of ownership for technology. This not only leads to immediate cost savings but also drives continuous improvement and innovation, positioning your organization for long-term success in an increasingly digital world.
Migrating to Cyferd represents more than just a change in technology – it’s a strategic move towards a more cost-effective, efficient, and agile business model. As large enterprises continue to navigate the complexities of digital transformation, Cyferd stands out as a powerful ally in the quest for optimized operations and reduced costs.
New York
Americas Tower
1177 6th Avenue
5th Floor
New York
NY 10036
London
2nd Floor,
Berkeley Square House,
Berkeley Square,
London W1J 6BD
Request a Demo
Comparisons
BOAT Platform Comparison 2026
Timelines and pricing vary significantly based on scope, governance, and integration complexity.
What Is a BOAT Platform?
Business Orchestration and Automation Technology (BOAT) platforms coordinate end-to-end workflows across teams, systems, and decisions.
Unlike RPA, BPM, or point automation tools, BOAT platforms:
- Orchestrate cross-functional processes
- Integrate operational systems and data
- Embed AI-driven decision-making directly into workflows
BOAT platforms focus on how work flows across the enterprise, not just how individual tasks are automated.
Why Many Automation Initiatives Fail
Most automation programs fail due to architectural fragmentation, not poor tools.
Common challenges include:
- Siloed workflows optimised locally, not end-to-end
- Data spread across disconnected platforms
- AI added after processes are already fixed
- High coordination overhead between tools
BOAT platforms address this by aligning orchestration, automation, data, and AI within a single operational model, improving ROI and adaptability.
Enterprise BOAT Platform Comparison
Appian
Strengths
Well established in regulated industries, strong compliance, governance, and BPMN/DMN modeling. Mature partner ecosystem and support for low-code and professional development.
Considerations
9–18 month implementations, often supported by professional services. Adapting processes post-deployment can be slower in dynamic environments.
Best for
BPM-led organizations with formal governance and regulatory requirements.
Questions to ask Appian:
- How can we accelerate time to production while maintaining governance and compliance?
- What is the balance between professional services and internal capability building?
- How flexible is the platform when processes evolve unexpectedly?
Cyferd
Strengths
Built on a single, unified architecture combining workflow, automation, data, and AI. Reduces coordination overhead and enables true end-to-end orchestration. Embedded AI and automation support incremental modernization without locking decisions early. Transparent pricing and faster deployment cycles.
Considerations
Smaller ecosystem than legacy platforms; integration catalog continues to grow. Benefits from clear business ownership and process clarity.
Best for
Organizations reducing tool sprawl, modernizing incrementally, and maintaining flexibility as systems and processes evolve.
Questions to ask Cyferd:
- How does your integration catalog align with our existing systems and workflows?
- What is the typical timeline from engagement to production for an organization of our size and complexity?
- How do you support scaling adoption across multiple business units or geographies?
IBM Automation Suite
Strengths
Extensive automation and AI capabilities, strong hybrid and mainframe support, enterprise-grade security, deep architectural expertise.
Considerations
Multiple product components increase coordination effort. Planning phases can extend time to value; total cost includes licenses and services.
Best for
Global enterprises with complex hybrid infrastructure and deep IBM investments.
Questions to ask IBM:
- How do the Cloud Pak components work together for end-to-end orchestration?
- What is the recommended approach for phasing implementation to accelerate time to value?
- What internal skills or external support are needed to scale the platform?
Microsoft Power Platform
Strengths
Integrates deeply with Microsoft 365, Teams, Dynamics, and Azure. Supports citizen and professional developers, large connector ecosystem.
Considerations
Capabilities spread across tools, requiring strong governance. Consumption-based pricing can be hard to forecast; visibility consolidation may require additional tools.
Best for
Microsoft-centric organizations seeking self-service automation aligned with Azure.
Questions to ask Microsoft:
- How should Power Platform deployments be governed across multiple business units?
- What is the typical cost trajectory as usage scales enterprise-wide?
- How do you handle integration with legacy or third-party systems?
Pega
Strengths
Advanced decisioning, case management, multi-channel orchestration. Strong adoption in financial services and healthcare; AI frameworks for next-best-action.
Considerations
Requires certified practitioners, long-term investment, premium pricing, and ongoing specialist involvement.
Best for
Organizations where decisioning and complex case orchestration are strategic differentiators.
Questions to ask Pega:
- How do you balance decisioning depth with deployment speed?
- What internal capabilities are needed to maintain and scale the platform?
- How does licensing scale as adoption grows across business units?
ServiceNow
Strengths
Mature ITSM and ITOM foundation, strong audit and compliance capabilities. Expanding into HR, operations, and customer workflows.
Considerations
Configuration-first approach can limit rapid experimentation; licensing scales with usage; upgrades require structured testing. Often seen as IT-centric.
Best for
Enterprises prioritizing standardization, governance, and IT service management integration.
Questions to ask ServiceNow:
- How do you support rapid prototyping for business-led initiatives?
- What is the typical timeline from concept to production for cross-functional workflows?
- How do licensing costs evolve as platform adoption scales globally?
